Google, for its part, claimed the perimeter wall was not high enough.
Appeals judges, however, concluded the man’s dignity had been flagrantly violated, and awarded him an amount in Argentine pesos equivalent to about $12,500, payable by Google.
“This involves an image of a person that was not captured in a public space but within the confines of their home, behind a fence taller than the average-sized person. The invasion of privacy... is blatant,” they wrote.
The judges said, “There is no doubt that in this case there was an arbitrary intrusion into another’s life”.
And they found there was “no justification for [Google] to evade responsibility for this serious error that involved an intrusion into the plaintiff’s house, within his private domain, undermining his dignity”.
“No one wants to appear exposed to the world as the day they were born.”
The judges pointed to Google’s policy of blurring the faces and licence plates of people and vehicles photographed for Street View as evidence that it was aware of a duty to avoid harm to third parties.
But in this case, “it was not his face that was visible but his entire naked body, an image that should also have been prevented”.
The court absolved co-accused telecoms company Cablevision SA and news site El Censor of liability for the image spreading, saying their actions had “helped highlight the misstep committed by Google”.
– Agence France-Presse