He is refusing to put a time limit on Australia's commitment but says the deployment will not be open-ended.
"[It is] to protect people in Iraq from the murderous rage from this Isis movement," he told the Nine Network. "I'm not going to put a time limit on it. It'll certainly be months rather than weeks. And quite possibly many, many months."
But Abbott said the commitment was not open-ended and Australia could withdraw after the Iraqi Government and the Kurdish regional government regained "reasonable control".
"We're not trying to create a liberal pluralist democracy, we're not trying to create a shining city on the hill - what we're trying to do is to help the people of Iraq to help themselves, so the people based in their country will no longer threaten us," he told ABC television.
The White House said yesterday that it would find countries willing to send combat troops to fight Isis, but it was too early to identify them.
White House chief of staff Denis McDonough signalled that the State Department in coming days will name allies that will pledge ground troops to fight Isis, something the US does not plan to do.
He said US personnel would train and equip Iraqi forces and moderate Syrian rebels to combat the group.
Facing strong public opposition to sending United States troops back into the Middle East, President Barack Obama said he did not plan to do so. But he said ground troops of some sort were essential.
For the past week, Secretary of State John Kerry has travelled across the Middle East, to Turkey and finally Paris for a conference of diplomats on the Isis problem last night, to pin down nations on what kind of support they will give to a global coalition.
Kerry said some nations were still deciding whether their contributions would target foreign fighters or financiers helping the militant group, send more humanitarian aid to Syrian and Iraqi refugees, mount a propaganda campaign to decry the extremists' brand of radical Islam or join a military mission.AP, AAP