If the letter linking Dominique Pelicot’s DNA with the attempted rape in 1999 had been taken into account by the judicial system in 2010, the abuse of Pelicot could have been prevented or shortened as the serial rapist would have been identified over a decade earlier, the report says.
The justice watchdog has said it cannot conclude “with certainty” that there was a failure, as it doesn’t know if the mail was ever received.
The Meaux office was undergoing extensive reorganisation and was overwhelmed with cases, with documents regularly disappearing, a magistrate who worked at the office at the time has said.
The report also points to a wider malfunction within the judicial processing of mail, with letters containing critical information returned to sender or destroyed before being opened, with a lack of computer records making tracing lost mail impossible.
The watchdog’s investigation also reveals the remaining “unsatisfactory” methods of mail distribution within the French court system, with DNA profiles still sometimes sent by regular post in France, risking their loss, despite their vitally important role in crime investigations.
Dominique Pelicot was sentenced in December 2024 to 20 years in prison, the maximum sentence of aggravated rape, as part of the biggest rape trial in French history, which saw 51 men convicted to serve over 400 years combined.
He has also been under investigation since 2022 for the rape and murder of Sophie Narme in 1991, and the 1999 attempted rape case linked to his DNA sample.
A Nanterre Cold Cases Unit is now trying to identify new potential victims of Dominique Pelicot.
Florence Rault, the lawyer representing the victims’ families in both cold cases, labelled the report’s findings “a farce”, with the state admitting “everything went wrong, but no one is responsible”.
Sign up to Herald Premium Editor’s Picks, delivered straight to your inbox every Friday. Editor-in-Chief Murray Kirkness picks the week’s best features, interviews and investigations. Sign up for Herald Premium here.