For example, the variant that emerged in India is not popularly known as B.1.617.2. Rather, it is known as delta, the fourth letter of the Greek alphabet.
Keep up to date with the day's biggest stories
Sign up to our daily curated newsletter for the day's top stories straight to your inbox.There are now seven "variants of interest" or "variants of concern," and they each have a Greek letter, according to a WHO tracking page.
Some other variants with Greek letters do not reach those classification levels, and the WHO also skipped two letters just before omicron — "nu" and "xi" — leading to speculation about whether "xi" was avoided in deference to the Chinese president, Xi Jinping.
"'Nu' is too easily confounded with 'new,'" Tarik Jasarevic, a spokesperson, said Saturday. "And 'xi' was not used because it is a common last name."
He added that the agency's best practices for naming diseases suggest avoiding "causing offense to any cultural, social, national, regional, professional or ethnic groups."
Some of the better-known variants, such as delta, rose to a variant of concern. Others in that category were named alpha, beta and gamma. Others that emerged, which were variants of interest, were named lambda and mu. Other Greek letters were used for variants that did not meet those thresholds but nu and xi were the only ones that were skipped.
The WHO has promoted the naming system as simple and accessible, unlike the variants' scientific names, which "can be difficult to say and recall, and are prone to misreporting," it said.
Some researchers agree.
Dr. Angela Rasmussen, a virologist at the University of Saskatchewan, said she conducted many interviews with reporters this year, before the Greek naming system was announced, and she stumbled through confusing explanations about the B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 variants. They are now known as alpha, which emerged in the United Kingdom, and beta, which emerged in South Africa.
"It makes it really cumbersome to talk about when you're constantly using an alphabet soup of variant designations," she said, adding, "Ultimately people end up calling it the UK variant or the South African variant."
That's the other big reason that the WHO moved to the Greek naming system, Rasmussen said: The older naming convention was unfair to the people where the virus emerged. The agency called the practice of describing variants by the places they were detected "stigmatising and discriminatory."
The practice of naming viruses for regions has also historically been misleading, Rasmussen said. Ebola, for example, is named for a river that's actually far from where the virus emerged.
"From the very beginning of the pandemic, I remember people saying: 'We called it the Spanish flu. Why don't we call it the Wuhan coronavirus?'" Rasmussen said. "The Spanish flu did not come from Spain. We don't know where it emerged from, but there's a very good possibility it emerged from the US."
The WHO encouraged national authorities and media outlets to adopt the new labels. They do not replace the technical names, which convey important information to scientists and will continue to be used in research.
This article originally appeared in The New York Times.
Written by: Vimal Patel
Photographs by: Joao Silva
© 2021 THE NEW YORK TIMES
