Women walk with their toddlers as residents visit a public park in Beijing. Photo / AP
Women walk with their toddlers as residents visit a public park in Beijing. Photo / AP
China on Thursday accused “some Western media” of bias, smears and political manipulation in their coverage of China’s abrupt ending of its strict “zero-Covid” policy, as it issued a vigorous defence of actions taken to prepare for the change of strategy.
The move in December to end mass testing andquarantines led to a sharp rise in cases, with some hospitals and crematoriums overwhelmed with victims.
An editorial in the ruling Communist Party mouthpiece People’s Daily outlined what it called China’s “optimisation and control measures” and blasted reports by media outlets they didn’t identify as “completely biased hype, smear and political manipulation with ulterior motives.”
Since the initial wave of new cases, life in much of China has largely returned to normal, although officials have expressed concern about a further spread of the virus into the countryside during the Lunar New Year travel rush now under way.
Despite that, the editorial, said many localities have “passed the peak of the epidemic, and production and life are speeding up to return to normal”.
Children ride on toy tanks in the snow at a public park in Beijing. Photo / AP
“Zero-Covid,” as the strategy came to be known, sought to track and isolate every case of infection, along with those who had contact with them and even third-hand contacts. It confined millions of people in cities such as Shanghai to their homes for two months or longer, with many suffering from food shortages and lack of access to health care.
China strongly defended the policy but began dismantling it under economic pressure and after highly rare street protests broke out in Beijing and other major cities denouncing the ruling party and its leader, Xi Jinping. On January 8, it took the further step of eliminating the requirement that those arriving from abroad undergo lengthy and expensive quarantines.
China rejected both foreign and domestic criticism of the policy’s excesses, denouncing earlier calls from the World Health Organisation for it to adjust to changes in the nature of the virus, calling them “irresponsible”.
That made the abrupt mid-winter shift to a policy of merely seeking to prevent the most serious cases all the more jarring for the population, many of whom have defied censors to express anger online. Virtually overnight, testing stations where people had stood in long lines disappeared, while field hospitals used to quarantine millions simply packed up.
China also ceased publishing figures on new cases and deaths, which it had long been suspected of under-reporting, leading to further complaints from the WHO and foreign nations about a lack of transparency. Unconfirmed estimates now put the number of new cases at tens of thousands a day, with up to 85 per cent of the population in some provinces having become infected.
Elderly patients are checked as they arrive at an emergency hall of a hospital in Beijing. Photo / AP
China has also rejected calls to release more data and provide more information about the origin of the virus, first detected in the central Chinese city of Wuhan in late 2019, accusing those making the requests of “politicising” the issue.
The Government has also lashed out at countries that require travellers coming from China to show a negative virus test, calling the demand “discriminatory” even though it requires the same of anyone entering China.
That defensive attitude was reflected in the People’s Daily editorial, which said: “Thanks to meticulous medical preparations, sufficient production capacity reserves, and strong organisational planning and equipment, China has smoothly passed the adaptation period after the ‘transition’ and ‘shift’ of the epidemic prevention policy.
“In the face of China’s prevention and control achievements, any political manipulation is pale and powerless,” it added, citing endorsements from academics in Nigeria, Kenya and Russia, all close Chinese diplomatic partners.
“All parties should focus on fighting the epidemic itself, avoid any words or deeds that politicise the epidemic, strengthen solidarity and co-operation, and work together to defeat the epidemic,” the editorial said.
