The legislation ordering social media firms to take 'reasonable steps' to prevent young teens from having accounts was passed in the Senate 34 to 19 in favour. Photo / 123rf
The legislation ordering social media firms to take 'reasonable steps' to prevent young teens from having accounts was passed in the Senate 34 to 19 in favour. Photo / 123rf
Australian lawmakers passed rules banning under 16s from social media, one of the world’s toughest crackdowns.
Fines of up to A$50 million await firms that fail to comply, but enforcement details are unclear.
PM Anthony Albanese supports the ban, aiming to reduce young people’s screen time and online risks.
Australia has passed landmark rules to ban under-16s from social media, approving one of the world’s toughest crackdowns on popular sites like Facebook, Instagram and X.
The legislation ordering social media firms to take “reasonable steps” to prevent young teens from having accounts was passed in the Senate with 34votes in favour and 19 against.
The firms – who face fines of up to A$50 million for failing to comply – have described the laws as “vague”, “problematic” and “rushed”.
The new rules will now return to the lower house – where MPs already backed the bill on Wednesday – for one final approval before it is all but certain to become law.
Speaking during the Senate debate, Greens politician Sarah Hanson-Young said the ban would not “make social media safer for young people”.
She said it was “devastating” that young people were “finding themselves addicted to these dangerous algorithms”.
Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, eyeing an election early next year, has enthusiastically championed the new rules and rallied Aussie parents to get behind it.
Anthony Albanese wanted young Australians 'off their phones and onto the footy and cricket field, the tennis and netball courts, in the swimming pool'. Photo / Getty Images
In the run-up to the vote, he painted social media as “a platform for peer pressure, a driver of anxiety, a vehicle for scammers and, worst of all, a tool for online predators”.
He wanted young Australians “off their phones and on to the footy and cricket field, the tennis and netball courts, in the swimming pool”.
But young social media users, like 12-year-old Angus Lydom, are not impressed.
“I’d like to keep using it. And it’ll be a weird feeling to not have it, and be able to talk to all my friends at home,” he told AFP.
Many are likely to try to find ways around it.
“I’ll find a way. And so will all my other friends,” Lydom said.
Similarly, 11-year-old Elsie Arkinstall said there was still a place for social media, particularly for children wanting to watch tutorials about baking or art.
“Kids and teens should be able to explore those techniques because you can’t learn all those things from books,” she added.
On paper, the ban is one of the strictest in the world.
But the current legislation offers almost no details on how the rules will be enforced – prompting concern among experts that it will simply be a symbolic piece of legislation that is unenforceable.
It will be at least 12 months before the details are worked out by regulators and the ban comes into effect.
Some companies will likely be granted exemptions, such as WhatsApp and YouTube, which teenagers may need to use for recreation, schoolwork or other reasons.
Late amendments were introduced to ensure government-issued digital ID cannot be used as a means of age verification.
Social media expert Susan Grantham told AFP that digital literacy programmes that teach children to think “critically” about what they see online should be adopted – similar to a model used in Finland.
The legislation will be closely monitored by other countries, with many weighing whether to implement similar bans.
Politicians from Spain to Florida have proposed social media bans for young teens, although none of the measures have been implemented yet.
China has restricted access for minors since 2021, with under-14s not allowed to spend more than 40 minutes a day on Douyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.
