The iPhone has been an instant hit. Photo / Herald on Sunday
The iPhone has been an instant hit. Photo / Herald on Sunday
KEY POINTS:
Apple's best-selling iPhone may be forced to carry an official health warning after being found to contain toxic chemicals.
The discovery could threaten the expected worldwide sweep of the device, whose US sales topped one million in just 2 1/2 months. It is not yet officially available inNew Zealand, although hackers have found ways to connect it to local phone networks.
The California company, which touts its green "leadership", was last week notified that it is in violation of its home state's law. It must respond within 60 days.
If found to be in breach it could either have to rebuild the phone, eliminating the toxins from the much-marketed product, or attach a warning label to it.
The iPhone, billed as revolutionising the mobile phone, combines three devices in one; a phone, a video player and a mobile internet device. But Greenpeace bought an iPhone in the US in June and had 18 of its materials and components independently tested for toxic substances.
Half of them tested positive for bromine, "suggesting widespread use" of brominated flame retardants; these are suspected of a range of threats to health, and the bromine itself can cause pollution when disposed of as waste.
Four items also tested positive for antimony, a toxic mineral often used with flame retardants, and others contained very small amounts of chromium and lead. Chlorine was found in the plastic coating of the headphone cables, indicating the presence of PVC.
In May, Apple promised that both PVC and the flame retardants would be banned from all its new products by 2009.
But the greatest headache for Apple is the discovery of phthalates, used to make plastic more flexible, in the cable coating. The chemicals are suspected of causing birth defects and gender-bending effects.
The Centre for Environmental Health says that under Californian law, products containing them must carry a warning label.
The CEH has notified the company that it is in violation and is threatening to sue. It believes the company may eliminate the materials rather than have to carry a warning label. Greenpeace says that all the chemicals found would be allowed under European law. Apple declined to comment.
