The cause and effect of this unsatisfactory sequence of events are pretty clear.
The cause was the inconsistent application of a rule - and the rule itself - that led to the warning that chair umpire Carlos Ramos gave to Williams for coaching coming from her player's box: If tennis would catch up with the 21st century and allow coaching on every point, the situation on the court would never have escalated to the level of absurdity that it did. Every player, after all, still has to play the match - she has to execute on every point, and she should never be held responsible for the actions of a coach. Coaching happens all the time, at all levels of tennis. So why not just allow it?
The effect was an abuse of power: Ramos crossed the line. He made himself part of the match. He involved himself in the end result. An umpire's job is to keep control of the match, and he let it get out of control. The rules are what they are, but the umpire has discretion, and Ramos chose to give Williams very little latitude in a match where the stakes were highest. Granted, Williams could have taken some responsibility and moved on after the first warning (and, speaking from experience, it's debatable whether she knew this was a warning or not), and before the point and game penalties started flying.
More Serena Williams coverage:
Serena Williams' controversial US Open outburst divides tennis world
Sally Jenkins: Power of Serena Williams and Naomi Osaka is overshadowed by an umpire's power play
Serena Williams fined only $26,000 out of $2.7m runner-up prize money
Serena Williams' US Open 2018 final row: How it unfolded
But, for her, and for many other women who have experienced an abuse of power at their workplaces, there was more at stake.
Did Ramos treat Williams differently than male players have been treated? I think he did. Women are treated differently in most arenas of life. This is especially true for women of colour. And what played out on the court yesterday happens far too often. It happens in sports, in the office and in public service. Ultimately, a woman was penalized for standing up for herself. A woman faced down sexism, and the match went on.
Women have a right, though, to speak out against injustice - as much right as a man. I found myself in similar situations in my career; once I even walked off the court in protest. It wasn't my proudest moment, but it may have been one of my more powerful ones. I understand what motivated Williams to do what she did. And I hope every single girl and woman watching yesterday's match realizes they should always stand up for themselves and for what they believe is right. Nothing will ever change if they don't.
Women are taught to be perfect. We aren't perfect, of course, and so we shouldn't be held to that standard. We have a voice. We have emotions. When we react adversely to a heated professional situation, far too often, we're labeled hysterical. That must stop. Tennis is a game, but for Williams and Osaka, it's also their job, their life's work. Yes, Williams was heated during the match, because she felt Ramos wasn't just penalizing her, but also attacking her character and professionalism. Her true leadership and character were revealed after the match, in the trophy presentation, when she shifted the spotlight to Osaka. She didn't have to, but she did. I know her - that's who she really is, and she knew it was the right thing to do.
Serena's a champion. She has done and continues to do the hard work. She was right to speak her mind, to put a voice to the injustice, and she was right to know when to call for the controversy to end.
King, a former world No. 1-ranked tennis player, founded the Women's Tennis Association and is co-founder of the Billie Jean King Leadership Initiative, a not-for-profit focused on fighting for equality in the workplace.
