I realise Mr Weldon-Smith is talking about a different sport but to hear some claim that there are not similar problems in rugby, or that the use of actors in this video somehow minimises the effectiveness of the campaign, beggars belief. This is a problem everywhere in New Zealand, has been for a long time, and good on Wellington Rugby for highlighting how ugly it can be.
From a marketing point of view, it would be a shame for this campaign to backfire on the organisers, but undoubtedly it could have been better framed. They could have told us upfront they sent actors into the game to show just how ugly sideline abuse is. That they allowed the public to think these 'parents' were real, was arguably a mistake.
However, we were all happy to believe they were real parents, weren't we? No questions asked. Doesn't that just show how conditioned to sideline abuse we have all become? Doesn't that in itself prove that this is an actual issue, one to be taken seriously?
Let's stay on point here: these risible people are at games up and down the country, every single weekend, and they are not acting.
In a post from Avalon supporter Nina Meteka, also published in the New Zealand Herald, Nina writes, "there were a lot more positive spectators at that game than those throwing abuse". That is entirely believable. Those who engage in this type of behaviour are, mercifully, in the minority but any minority in this case is too big. Zero tolerance must be the only goal.
I was fortunate enough to watch an under-10 game in Wellington two weekends ago. My little mate George White and his friends ran around on the muddy, wind-swept pitch at Ian Galloway Park to a chorus of encouragement from coaches and parents alike. It was as supportive and collegial a morning as I could have wished for, but that should be the expectation at kids' sport, shouldn't it?
The Wellington Rugby video did not focus on the positive behaviour of parents because, as an organisation, that is their expectation, too. It was the goal of this campaign to show people how not to behave during a kids' rugby match, and in that I believe they have succeeded.
It would be wrong to attack the integrity of the organisation in this instance. The imperfection of the campaign should not outweigh its importance. It strikes me that the reason people are so upset now is because suddenly they have no one to form a shame pile on.
Trust me, that's no real loss, but missing the point would be.