As much as I'm a rugby purist and love the best XV against the best XV match-up, the game has changed. Now your bench and the way you manipulate substitutions is a big part of the way the modern game is played.
On the All Blacks, I don't believe they should bother analysing their victory over the Boks too closely. They got a few things wrong - I thought they kicked away too much ball. But, ultimately, their perseverance won them the game. They stuck by what they thought would beat the Boks and it did.
It was a grind, and my feeling after the game was one I haven't felt in a long time after an All Blacks test - relief. The last time I felt that was probably the World Cup final of 2011, a match they probably didn't deserve to win. However, there was no doubt the All Blacks deserved to beat the Boks at Twickenham.
They got into an arm-wrestle and they didn't want that. Credit to the opposition, they worked out how to slow the ball down - they hit them high and put them under pressure.
But two tries to none and also the way the All Blacks created pressure was the winning of the game. The Boks spent no time pressuring the All Blacks' line. None, zero. They couldn't create phase play past six or seven phases and that's what the game boils down to.
As I say, I believe it would be detrimental to analyse that game too closely. They need to look forward. They just need to say, we're in the final, we've beaten South Africa, who are the third best team in the world and now we have to beat the second best team in the world - Australia.