We've got to be careful we don't get like league. I like league and enjoy watching it, but they've taken the use of the TMO to extremes on try decisions and it kills the game.
Rugby is starting to go down that path but they cannot afford to. The one advantage league has got it is a fairly simple game with few rules.
What's the end point for rugby? Do we have the TMO looking at the previous scrum, trying to determine whether the tighthead was boring in? Or whether the flanker might have left early?
Right now, New Zealand Rugby CEO Steve Tew is at an IRB ,meeting, discussing the future of the game. I hope they're looking at this issue as stringently as, say, scrums.
Rugby should be about celebrating and commiserating... not waiting. It should be about teaching the good sportsmanship that comes with accepting bad decisions, knowing they'll even out in the end.
Just look at the players. They go from the euphoria of thinking they've scored a try to the purgatory of waiting for a TMO to make a decision. Even if it is eventually awarded, that moment is lost forever.
Do we really want that?
The club player has no access to technology, but it still doesn't stop him or her turning up each week and having a ball.
I know there's a lot on the line at the top level. There's trophies and all sorts of revenue at stake.
But we can't forget what the essence of sport is about. I can't help but feel the TMO is stripping away some of that.
What do you think?