Cruden struggled for 60 minutes against Argentina in awful conditions. He wasn't helped by the work of the pack or the intensity of the Pumas defence, but still...it was test football and things aren't supposed to be easy.
What impressed was the gutsy way he dug in, tried to adapt and play a game more suited to the weather and bring himself into the contest.
It was much the same against the Boks where events were remarkably similar. The experience will have done Cruden good in the long term but it also exposed a few areas of concern.
His kicking game is improved on 2010, but not really top drawer stuff. At this level, an All Black No 10 has to have the full range at his disposal: he also has to know when to kick high to create a contest; when to go long to turn the back three and when to chip over the top and chase.
That's not really Cruden's game either in execution or decision-making. He's at his best running onto flat passes and beating the first defender or playing others through the hole.
That much became clear in the last two weeks and the selectors will be conscious that to win in Argentina and South Africa, they need a No 10 with a booming boot: their kicking game has to be first-class and if Carter isn't fit, then maybe the next best option in that regard is Barrett.
It will be an enormous test of character - a huge leap of faith to throw a 21-year-old into those cauldrons...but, again, this is test football and that's what happens: players are pushed outside their comfort zone and asked to confront their demons.
The steadier, more cultured boot of Barrett appeals in those venues with Cruden a valuable option on the bench to be injected in the final 20 minutes to inject pace and trickery against tiring defences.