2: Was the red card justified?
WG - It was if du Plessis was guilty of two yellow card offences. His first tackle looked legitimate, his second careless because he led with his forearm. Officials need to be much more certain in their judgement.
GP - Yes. The first offence was not a yellow - although what Bismarck du Plessis did with his head looked bad. But the second offence was a straight red. Seriously bad. The Boks need to cut that out -they are better than that.
PM - No, because his tackle on Dan Carter was legal. The spotlight for the decison to sin bin him must fall on referee Romain Poite, who appeared to dismiss the advice of his TMO George Ayoub. However, once back on the field, de Plessis should have reigned himself in a little. The elbow to the windpipe of Liam Messam wasn't a good look.
3: Was Sam Cane as good as Steve Hansen said he was?
WG - He was part of a strong All Black eight and Hansen is going to praise a young man he believes in, who is on his way up in test rugby and has to deputise for the great man.
GP - He was excellent. Brave and tough - in all the right places. That was a serious investigation of his ability and he came through with an eight out of 10.
PM - A cautious yes. He wasn't overawed by the occasion or the Boks but he didn't come up with any really big plays which made you sit up and take notice. His try owed much to his determination - he flung himself at the line with no thought to his wellbeing, a good thing at this level. He will definitely be better for this test.