I fully understand her sentiments and domestic violence stance, but there is still a big hole in that argument. What if he didn't do it?
The phrase "alarm bells" is a long, long, long way from a safe conviction. The way police lay charges, and the number of them, can be tactical and does not necessarily reflect a situation accurately either way.
To turn the argument around, we should protect people's reputations and livelihoods from the dangers presented by "alarm bells".
Don't overreact because he is a star. A public sacking could also prejudice a trial because standing Kenny-Dowall down makes him seem like a guilty man. We have to work extra hard in cases like this, to protect the assumption of innocence. Establishing "beyond reasonable doubt" is for the prosecution, not a public plaything. The time to make a major stand, depending on the verdicts, is after the trial.
My closing argument: I'm open to persuasion here. But to be con-vinced otherwise, and with all due respect, I'd need to hear a better opposing case than what I can find so far.