The late change will leave league fans on this side of the Tasman equally upset, considering only two of the 14 annual fixtures have been played in New Zealand since the concept was initiated in 1997. Canberra and Sydney have hosted the last two games, with the NZRL happy to cede the rights last year on the proviso the centenary clash would be here.
But, with that agreement seemingly ignored, the unbalanced relationship between the NZRL and Australian Rugby League has again been elucidated.
"It's a mammoth organisation," Holden said. "It's large. It's got a big footprint and it owns a lot of emotional space in Australia.
"We're a lot smaller but the Four Nations demonstrated that we do have capability, that there is a significant interest in international football in this country, and the commercial dynamics can work.
"We've got to strengthen our relationship with the Australians to such a point there's a lot more visibility of their draws and their schedules and the things they're doing, so the two countries are a lot more aligned strategically."
Former Kiwi Hugh McGahan was dismayed the NZRL failed to put up a bigger fight for the match.
"It just proves further how much the Australians control the game without much thought at all of other countries," he said. "To allow it to be changed is crazy. I'm surprised New Zealand Rugby League haven't jumped up and down, or taken it to the international federation to prevent that from happening."
McGahan thought the fixture would have been another important step in growing the game on this side of the Tasman, with the swap creating doubts about Australia's motivations.
"I thought the NRL and Australian Rugby League would have wanted to capitalise on [the Four Nations], to promote the game more in this country. Without trying to sound like a conspiracy theorist, after they lost in Wellington, maybe the Australians didn't like that and they've pushed hard to get the venue changed."