Steve Smith escaped with a slap on the wrist by the ICC for his role in the ball-tampering scandal — but it could get much worse for the Australian captain and his vice-captain David Warner.
The ICC suspended Smith for the fourth Test and fined him 100 per cent of his match fee for conduct contrary to the spirit of the game as he and Warner stepped down from their leadership duties on the final day in Cape Town.
Cameron Bancroft, who carried out the incident, was handed three demerit points and also fined 75 per cent of his match fee for ball tampering.
But a Cricket Australia investigation into the incident could have far more serious consequences.
Read more:
How TV cameras caught Aussie cheating
Dylan Cleaver: Having the (tampered) balls to take on Australia
Cricket world mercilessly mocks Australian team
World reacts to Steve Smith's decision to step down as captain in Cape Town
A national day of shame': How Australia reacted to ball-tampering scandal
Cricket ball-tampering: How it works, why players do it and what are the punishments?
The Aussie cheating crisis
6 Questions from cricket's ugly ball tampering bombshell
The steep descent of Australian captain Steve Smith bombshell
This is worse than 'mintgate' says SA skipper
CA's Head of Integrity Iain Roy and team performance manager Pat Howard travelled to South Africa to begin interviews with Smith, Warner, Bancroft and coach Darren Lehmann.
Roy will then decide how players are charged under CA's code of behaviour.
According to ESPN Cricinfo, if Roy hands down a charge of conduct contrary to the spirit of the game, an independent commissioner would then be brought in to give a ruling.
The maximum penalty available is a life ban.
The ICC ruling for Bancroft means he'll be free to take part in the fourth and final Test of the series, pending Cricket Australia's investigation.
According to the ICC rule books, ball tampering is a level 2 offence and carries up to four demerit points (automatic one match suspension) and up to 100 per cent match fee fine.
There was widespread condemnation for the soft ICC decision.
One Test ban from @ICC for just the captain when they admitted a group came together and conspired to cheat the game?? Aussies must be giggling again! Assume @CricketAus will be far less lenient #sandpapergate
— Matt Prior (@MattPrior13) March 25, 2018
If you only get a 1 Match ban and hit with a fine over admitting to cheating as an International Captain!! ... If the ICC are going by their list of sanctions against certain actions I think it’s time they were updated ... #SAvAUS
— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) March 25, 2018
A little birdie tells me that the weak ICC punishment isn’t anywhere near what Cricket Australia is thinking....
— Kevin Pietersen🦏 (@KP24) March 25, 2018
How the hell has the Vice Captain of this Australian Team & all the Leadership group not been penalised !!!!!!! #SAvAUS
— Michael Vaughan (@MichaelVaughan) March 25, 2018
wow @ICC wow. Great treatment nd FairPlay. No ban for Bancroft with all the evidences whereas 6 of us were banned for excessive appealing in South Africa 2001 without any evidence and Remember Sydney 2008? Not found guilty and banned for 3 matches.different people different rules
— Harbhajan Turbanator (@harbhajan_singh) March 25, 2018