Their appointments continue a pattern. England has always been the primary influence in New Zealand football, but it has been particularly pronounced since 2014.
At this rate, it wouldn't surprise if there was soon a Union Jack alongside the Silver Fern at NZF HQ, along with stocks of Irn-Bru and Bovril in the cupboard. Joking aside, the appointments raise several issues.
Firstly, for all their wonderful traditions, culture and football heritage, there are many other countries way ahead of England when it comes to producing coaches. That's why there are almost no English coaches working in any of the big European leagues.
Secondly, regardless of the abilities of the above quartet, it's inevitable that there will be elements of 'group think'. When everyone has the same cultural background, it's hard for ideas from outside the box to seep in and rare that conventional thinking is challenged, which doesn't create an optimal high performance environment.
Thirdly, other cultural influences could benefit NZF football immensely. What about the Japanese or Korean school of thought? What could our young players learn from a South American mentality, or an Eastern European perspective?
Australia is the best, and most relevant example. They have long since abandoned England as their only point of reference, and look at their progress. They've been helped by immigration patterns, with large eastern European influences, but have also been more proactive and open in their thinking.
To get the day's top sports stories in your inbox, sign up to our newsletter here