Conn wrote: "That could turn out to be true but from the grinning executive who joined a fusty Fifa in 1975 to the shaky president expelled from the multibillion dollar world governing body 40 years later, no account of Sepp Blatter will ever be entirely straightforward."
The Independent described Blatter's press conference statement as "bizarre and confusing"
Glenn Ebrey of The Times wrote: "Although the outgoing Fifa president used the word sorry on several occasions...he did not appear to apologise for anything."
In the same paper, chief football writer Oliver Kay, under a headline "Forget the appeal, this is the end for Blatter" described the disgraced boss as looking "frail and a little dishevelled".
"...(he) has vowed to fight on but, finally, his days are numbered."
The Telegraph's Paul Hayward suggested banned Uefa president Michael Platini's "offence feels worse because he framed himself as the football man, the soul of the game, who sought high office only to serve the sport he loved."
Hayward continued: "...Platini: now, there was a man you could marvel at on YouTube, at once a musketeer from the 1970s and 80s and a statesman of the modern game who was behind 'Financial Fair Play' (how risible that high-blown concept sounds now.)
A state of denial is a virulent affliction for football's lake-dwellers - and Platini has a bad case of it. He cannot see how accepting $2 million from Blatter shortly before he (Platini) agreed not to challenge Blatter for the Fifa presidency might offend the sensibilities of those who think transparency and accountability are vital attributes of governing bodies.