The overall numbers would be even bleaker were it not for some smart accounting, with several clubs selling off assets to their own ownership groups.
Saudi-backed Newcastle United sold their St James’ Park stadium to another company owned by the club’s shareholders to turn a profit, while Everton and Aston Villa cashed in on their women’s teams.
“The problem with the Premier League is that clubs are so incentivised to overspend,” football finance expert Kieran Maguire told AFP.
“It’s an arms race at the end of the day in terms of competing for players on transfer fees and wages,” Maguire said.
The figures for the 2024/25 campaign do not even fully account for a record £3b spent on transfer fees by Premier League clubs in last year’s summer transfer window, smashing the previous high by £650m.
Liverpool’s £125m signing of Alexander Isak set a new record for an English club and was part of a £450m window for the English champions, which has so far failed to reap tangible reward.
Wages continue to spiral, reaching £4.4b last season, a 9% increase on the previous year, outstripping the 7% rise in revenue.
Spending on agents also reached new highs, fuelling fans’ anger at the money flowing out of the game while they are asked to pay higher ticket prices.
In the frenzied world of the Premier League, success in an increasingly competitive league is no longer measured solely by trophies.
For the second consecutive year, at least five English sides will qualify for the Champions League, which guarantees a huge financial windfall.
New financial rules will be introduced next season focused on limiting squad cost in line with revenue.
Spending on wages, transfer fees and agents must not exceed 85% of revenue, with a stricter 70% limit placed on teams in Uefa competitions.
However, those changes are unlikely to make a significant impact on losses, with operating costs, which jumped to US$1.9b for Premier League clubs last season, excluded.
Despite clubs’ tendencies to haemorrhage money, they remain an attractive asset because of their scarcity value and role in the Premier League’s global soap opera.
British billionaire Sir Jim Ratcliffe’s 27.7% stake in Manchester United, bought for £1.25b in 2024, valued the 20-time English champions at £4.5b.
Chelsea were sold in 2022 for a total package worth £4.25b to a consortium led by American investor Todd Boehly and private equity firm Clearlake Capital.
Manchester City have become the dominant force in the English game since a takeover backed by the Abu Dhabi royal family, while the Saudi Arabian sovereign wealth fund took control of Newcastle in 2021.
Former Manchester United captain Gary Neville believes the scale of Chelsea’s financial problems could signal a slowdown in the bull market for English clubs.
But Maguire argues that losses are deemed affordable by super-rich owners.
“With billionaire owners and sovereign wealth funds in charge of clubs, whilst the losses seem high, for those people, they are deemed to be affordable,” he said.
“Unless there’s a mindset change from club owners in terms of controlling your core costs, which are player-related in transfer fees and wages, we’re going to continue in this vein for some time.”
– Agence France-Presse