New Zealand Cricket are unlikely to want to press the players to do something they really don't want to. But they have other balls (as it were) in the air.
Such as fostering CCR (Closer Cricket Relations) with the neighbours.
Having been shunned in recent years (remember the last test clash was three and a half years ago, a thrilling seven-run win in Hobart, you may recall), New Zealand's rapidly improving form under Brendon McCullum, and attendant rise in the rankings, makes them an appealing opponent, both for the quality of their cricket, and the way they approach the game.
New Zealand want more transtasman activity, understandably.
CA want day-night tests which they maintain will be a crowd-puller and produce better television revenue.
Let's suppose CA guarantee to NZC they'll become more regular playing mates in the years ahead, and for starters there are five or six tests - still to be finalised - looming next summer, but first we really want that day-nighter.
What's NZC to do? The New Zealand players mightn't fancy it, and NZC probably don't want to strong-arm their players, but there is pragmatism to consider.
Here's a thought: why not roll the sleeves up and give this idea a genuine crack? Once the die is cast, assuming it is, become pro-active, welcome the prospect. Day-night tests might die a rapid death, and there are areas of the cricket world where the climate doesn't lend itself to night-time test cricket in any case.
New Zealand will have leadup matches to prepare, and get used to the vagaries of the pink ball. But the worst thing would be to go into the match fretting, not wanting to be there, figuring it's too gimmicky by half.
If push comes to firmer push, why not try it. New Zealand have been given an opportunity to be part of cricket history, albeit a quirky part of it. If it comes, embrace it, make the most if it. You never know, they might a) enjoy it more than they think, and b) even win the test.
