Hesson said: "Allan Border Oval wasn't available. We had a memorandum of understanding signed off we'd play a good side. Obviously it didn't say we'd paly in Blacktown on a not so good surface, otherwise we wouldn't have singed it off.
"(but) we had plenty of good nets in Brisbane, to be ready on the first day...no excuses there."
During other questioning, he said the New Zealand attack had been "a bit underdone from a skills perspective".
Craig was blasted for 150 runs as Australia went on a first innings rampage before he mounted a three-wicket comeback in the second. Hesson backed the finger spinner.
"Mark has won a number of games of cricket for us - as a New Zealand test match spinner that doesn't happen that often. He's a big part of our side, bats at eight, fields at second slip, scores some valuable runs and takes wickets for us in the second innings.
Unfortunately he had most of his role to play in the first innings," said Hesson.
Hesson batted away questions on Mitchell Starc, the Aussie paceman who was fined half his match pay for hurling the ball close to Craig on the final day of the Gabba test.
"I really have no interest how he operates to be fair - it's more about what he does with the ball rather than what he does with his mouth or throws the ball," said Hesson.
"I thought the match referee dealt with it appropriately - if that (Starc's behaviour) makes us angry it means we are a bit consumed with things out of our control. There are plenty of things for us to worry about."