Last week I suggested we may be seeing evidence of climate change with all the storms and the fact the insurance companies are paying out more than ever for weather-related damage.
Another point was suggested to me by reader Merv Merrilees, who works for the Department of Anatomy with Radiology at the University of Auckland. Merrilees has written to me a few times over the years countering points I've made on climate change. As a self-described sceptic ("I am sceptical of claims of impending catastrophe, and I am sceptical that humans and CO2 are significant drivers," he says) he has always presented me with a balanced view from the other side of the coin to Niwa.
He says: "I remember reading an analysis of the increased insurance claims - conclusion was that the increase is independent of any warming, and more due to people moving into the coastal areas affected by storms, hence more claims for flooding and storm damage.
"As a graduate student I spent time collecting fish in the swamps south of Mobile, Alabama, near the Mississippi delta. Now it's a built-up area with houses on drained land and more houses right on the coast."
For those who don't know, Mobile is on the Gulf Coast and is frequently hit by hurricanes, so Merv makes a valid point. More people live in low-lying areas near coastlines throughout the world, which are more vulnerable to damage.
As someone who has always supported a commonsense approach to climate change, I'd like to hear more from New Zealand experts on both sides, and more transparency about any climate change taxes, where that money will be used and why they believe it will help our future.