"We have given due consideration to advice from independent consultants and Watercare's specialist management who investigated the short-list of four sites.
"The only amendment to Watercare management's recommendation is to bolster the efforts to minimise the adverse effects on significant trees within the construction area, and to ensure that we undertake appropriate off-set mitigation. In addition the board has asked management to establish a community liaison group to act as the key communication point.
"Through the assessment process, Parker Road North and Manuka Road emerged as the preferred sites. And from a balance of the technical and environmental plus economic perspectives, there was no real difference between them.
"However the key question was about minimising loss. The loss of trees and vegetation on the Manuka Road site can be mitigated by Watercare's progressive planting of an 1800-hectare block in the Hunua Ranges," Devlin said.
The four options investigated:
Parker Rd (north site)
One of two sites at Oratia, affecting 12 properties.
Pros:Good elevation and plenty of open land.
Cons: Strong opposition from locals.
Parker Rd (south site)
One of two sites at Oratia, affecting 18 properties.
Pros: Good elevation and plenty of open land.
Cons: Strong opposition from locals
Huia Water Treatment site, Titirangi
Pros: Site of existing treatment plan
Cons: Would take 20 per cent of Auckland's water out for more than two years. Includes native bush in a protected ecological zone.
Manuka Rd
Alongside Huia treatment plant.
Pros: Close to existing plant.
Cons: Contains native bush in a protected ecological zone.