In response, Souls has created a online survey, seeking feedback on the camps from both former and current students.
The group said in a statement it would be difficult to fairly and accurately represent the experiences of the majority of students from any review focused on a small number of experiences.
Students were also asked if they wanted the camp reinstated next year and what changes were needed.
Souls expressed concerns about the process in their submission to the review and would be raising further concerns after reviewing the student responses. There have already been more than 250 responses.
A post on the group's Facebook page said the draft focused on alcohol, sexualised behaviour and pressure; very little attention was given to community service, sports, and friendship aspect of the camps. It was hoped any negative feedback could be used to improve future camps.
The university expected to receive the report once Sim had considered the information he received back from the draft, a university spokeswoman said in a statement. The terms of reference were sufficiently broad to allow Sim to take into account information he deemed relevant.
The investigation had initially been expected to be completed by the end of July.