"It is clearly farcical to have a system whereby you can have a referendum and then the Government just ignores it if it doesn't suit. Five out of five have been ignored."
Mr Craig did not believe there should be provision for a Government veto on fiscal grounds, but if there were significant fiscal implications the question should address that and how it would be paid for. Mr Peters said any referendum result could only be overruled by a significant majority in Parliament.
There have been five such referenda since the Citizens' Initiated Referenda Act was passed in 1993 and all have had a result of more than two thirds voting one way. If the two-thirds majority threshold applied, the Government would have had to halt its partial asset sales programme, a referenda aimed at halting the anti-smacking bill would have been binding and Parliament would only have 99 MPs. Mr Peters said that in recognition of that second referenda, which was voted on in the 1999 election, his party policy was to reduce the size of Parliament from 120 to 100 MPs.
Others that got more than two thirds support included giving greater rights to victims and requiring serious offenders to do hard labour, and a referenda to boost the number of professional firefighters.
Herald DigiPoll survey
Q: Should the result of a citizens' initiated referendum be binding and therefore require the Government to change the law if the outcome of the referendum decrees it?
Yes: 66 per cent
No: 22 per cent
Don't know: 12.3 per cent
Poll of 750 eligible voters has a margin of error of +/- 3.6 per cent