There has been a lot of discussion recently about New Zealand's meat industry. We all want more profitable and sustainable farming. Meat farmers have been concerned that their gross incomes are a bit lower than dairy farmers on similar sized farms. For meat, three numbers make bridging that gap challenging.
Three challenging numbers
Subscribe to listen
Conor English Chief executive
The third number is the capital invested. There will be meat farmers achieving higher returns on capital than some dairy farmers. However, generally dairy farmers do invest more capital both on- and off-farm than meat farmers, so their gross income is therefore likely to be proportionately more.
Recently, I explained that it is unrealistic to expect a return from an asset you don't own. I can't receive rent from the neighbouring house if someone else has invested in it.
So there is an issue about how much and where capital is invested. This is true for both dairy and meat farmers.
Some suggest over-capacity is a significant issue. The printing industry has the same issue and the market has dealt with it.
To make any progress, it is going to take more than incremental thinking. Until meat farmers produce or invest far more per hectare, or meat companies are able to extract far more significant returns from the marketplace, the relative gross income gap between meat and dairy farmers will continue. This is a similar situation to the gap in income between dairy farms and kiwifruit orchards.
Some great progress has actually been made by farmers and meat companies alike. However we need to keep at it.