The Otago University research, which questioned 977 patients and received 354 completed responses, asked what benefits were likely from screenings and preventive medication and at which point they would consider using intervention.
Ninety per cent of respondents overestimated the effect of breast cancer screening, 94 per cent overestimated the effect of bowel cancer screening, 82 per cent overestimated the effect of hip fracture preventive medication, and 69 per cent overestimated the effect of preventive medication for cardiovascular disease.
Hudson said the results, published this week, were in line with research completed overseas.
Penno said she was not surprised with the results, and said the tendency to vastly overestimate screening effectiveness came back to how information had been presented in the past.
In the past the benefits had been over-played and the harms had been played-down, or not even mentioned.
But that seemed to be shifting, particularly in the past five years."I think there's been an international shift, and an increasing awareness that people deserve more balanced information so they're able to make better informed choices, whether or not to participate in screening programmes."