And so it was this week for Little.
The issue was housing. The problem overcrowding.
The journalists were given the address. Turn up and Labour will show you 17 poor people at one address living in a tent.
The journalists are there ahead of you. Everything is ready to go. But then the homeowner wanders out to tell the journos there is no problem, there is no overcrowding, the tent is for furniture and material while he renovates.
The homeowner sounds content and aspirational. He's fixing up his house. He's looking to the future. It's a disaster.
The stunt reinforces the impression that Andrew Little is unlucky and bumbling.
Little's staff hastily redirect journos to the local Labour office. The leader is "a little lost for words and confused about which house he was meant to be at".
But no matter, there was a house with a tent that his local MPs had been working with. Just not that house.
It's hard to comprehend how such a monumental error could be made. Had the local MPs not talked to the homeowner? Had Little's staff not checked and rechecked the story?
I don't have the answers but the stunt reinforces the impression that Little is unlucky and bumbling. The story will have hardly registered to most and will soon be forgotten except by political tragics such as myself who will tell and retell the story to highlight the importance of preparation and how things can go horribly wrong.
Labour has no route to power without the support of Winston Peters. Peters can't abide amateurs. He isn't about to make one Prime Minister.
Debate on this article is now closed.