Third: terrorism is a real and present threat. An attack took place just across the Tasman. We aren't safe in New Zealand. The same could happen here. We should not be taking any chances. Our world has changed. Terrorists are part and parcel of modern life. Nowhere is safe.
However, Monis was not a terrorist. There was no organised terror. He was a lone madman with a shotgun. He had no organisation, no followers, and followed no one. He didn't even have a flag. Sydney's was not a terrorist attack.
Fourth: tougher immigration laws are needed. Monis was a Muslim refugee from Iran. He should never have been let in.
But then again, immigrants aren't the problem. Disturbed people with guns are. The New Zealand Raurimu and Aramoana massacres were committed by locals.
Fifth: John Key was right to strengthen our anti-terror laws. Our security is threatened. It can happen anywhere. The namby-pambies bleating about civil rights should now shut up. Sydney proved Key's point.
On the contrary, though, not one of Key's changes would have made a difference. We are trading away our privacy and freedom without any gain in public safety. A few years ago a madman with a gun was a madman with a gun. Now he's a terrorist attack justifying new and intrusive laws.
Maybe the true point is that the Sydney siege was a tragedy. And politics should be put aside. Just for a little while.
Debate on this article is now closed.