“The rates cap is hard because we’re not buying pies at the supermarket – we’re buying roads, bridges and things like that,” Barker said.
“We’ve heard stick to roads, pipes and all that core infrastructure, but we won’t be able to afford even the core infrastructure at a 4% rates hike,” Drysdale said.
Watts said the Government was aware of the risks of underinvestment and the need to support growth and would give councils time to plan and adjust by implementing the change in stages.
But he also pointed to the need to contain rates rises – with Newstalk ZB analysis showing rates have surged at a record pace over the past three-year electoral term.
“I expect councils to make full use of the funding and financing tools available to them – ensuring fees and charges accurately recover the costs of providing private-good services, using debt financing to spread the costs of infrastructure over time and maximising the new funding and financing tools,“ Watts said.
“If a council believes it cannot undertake vital work within the target range, it has the option to apply for a variation. Any approval will require a clear plan for returning to the target band over time.”
Auckland Council officers claim the rates cap will lead to higher costs for Auckland ratepayers and have suggested the Government could instead consider a rates “target” – similar to the Reserve Bank’s medium-term inflation target – with consequences for councils that are outside that range without due cause.
Watts said the Government had consulted on the policy design and would be considering all feedback before making any final decisions.
Michael Sergel is Newstalk ZB’s business reporter. He’s been covering business, politics, local government and consumer affairs for more than a decade.