And while those who oppose 1080 - and there are many - will say it's indiscriminate, what is the alternative? And while we attempt to find that alternative, what is the cost to the environment? The Department of Conservation is already up against it trying to protect our native species.
This weekend in the Waitakeres I've seen a hare, a stoat and two rats. That's in the course of the weekend. And that's in an area that's been declared an SEA - a Significant Ecological Area. I've twice had to remove parts of my roof in the last five years because of rats.
The pest issue in the Waitakeres is pretty extreme, and I know the situation there isn't unique.
I still can't quite see how the Government is going to achieve its goal of making New Zealand predator free by 2050, admirable though it is. But at the very least, if they're to pursue it, the decision when and where to use 1080 has to be taken at a national level.
What does it do for our clean, green image? Well, what's happening to our clean, green brand while these pests destroy ecosystems and wreck havoc on our native species?
There is no easy solution to our pest problem, and it's a hugely polarising issue.
But one thing is for sure - the pests won't leave on their own accord, so in that sense, surely this is a step in the right direction