“Is it news today? Do you think that’s a really smart question - honestly?” he responded to the reporter.
“With everything going on in New Zealand today, when you’ve got people outside in this country struggling to get from pay cheque to pay cheque who actually want us to rebuild the economy, restore law and order, deliver better public services, that’s the most important question today - at a time today when when we’ve actually delivered more school lunches to more kids at lower cost and good lunches. That’s a good outcome.”
Luxon told the reporter he did not believe sushi and quinoa were woke.
The word “woke”, to mean socially progressive, has its origins in African-American slang, which is not traditionally embraced by New Zealand political parties. It has entered wider usage in the last decade, including in Parliament, where “woke” appears now to be used more as an adjective than in its traditional form as the past tense of the verb “to wake”.
In the first eight days of this month alone, MPs have used the term in five separate instances (in some instances they have used it more than once - and once it was used to mean “waking up”). That is quite an impressive amount of “woke” usage, considering the word “debt”, of which the Government currently owes $173 billion, only came up in 10 instances.
MPs have used the word “woke” as many times in the last eight days than they did in the final year of the last National-led Government in 2017, although the last sitting day of that Parliament was in August.
In every single one of those instances, the word “woke” was followed by the word “up”.
NZ First MPs have a particular élan for dropping the word in the House.
MP Shane Jones, answering patsy questions from colleague Andy Foster, said earlier this month that the “naive wokeism, the juvenile understanding of economics that drove the stigmatisation of the gas industry has disappeared, no longer to be seen anymore”.
This inspired his leader, Winston Peters, to jump into the line of patsy questions with his own: “Could the minister tell us what he and his department are doing about the irony of importing so much inferior Indonesian coal while not using our own, and thereby placating our so-called green woke conscience?”
Things did not end there.
Local Government Minister Simeon Brown attacked the former Government’s review of local government, which he said asked the right questions but “,ended up finding all the woke answers”, a phrase Brown repeated twice for emphasis.
In the same debate, Green MP Celia Wade-Brown appeared to defend “woke” saying she believed it was “better to be woke than asleep”, although given the increasingly soporific tendency of “woke” usage in the House, this is not always strictly true.
Outgoing Green Party co-leader James Shaw used the word “woke” twice in his valedictory speech. Refreshingly, in both instances he used the word to describe the process of moving from a state of sleep to one of wakefulness.
Just this afternoon, Jones repeated the term again, attacking “juvenile, woke-riddled, foolish belief that we don’t need our natural resources, that we don’t need our natural gas, that we don’t need coal”.
For more political news and views, listen to On the Tiles, the Herald’s politics podcast:
Thomas Coughlan is Deputy Political Editor and covers politics from Parliament. He has worked for the Herald since 2021 and has worked in the press gallery since 2018.
