KEY POINTS:
Conflicting stories over the actions of a police officer who arrested and pepper sprayed an innocent man, have emerged as the matter comes before a court.
Six years ago police broke into Michael Gregory's home, emptied a can of pepper spray into his eyes, and arrested him for
crimes he didn't commit. The charges were later dropped.
His father Stan has spent tens of thousands of dollars on civil proceedings against the officers to fight the "miscarriage of justice", because police refuse to lay criminal charges.
Now, documents obtained by the Herald on Sunday have revealed discrepancies in the story of the officer at the centre of the case.
Constable Thomas Gollan first said he had entered the house through a window, resulting in an altercation with Gregory and the use of the pepper spray. The police defence to the Gregorys' civil case now says Gregory resisted arrest at the window, so Gollan sprayed him.
According to a disciplinary report filed to the Police Complaints Authority, officers investigating a burglary in Papakura followed a police dog to Gregory's house in the early hours.
Gregory, who spoke to Gollan through his bedroom window, refused to open the front door without a search warrant or permission from his father - which he is entitled to do.
The disciplinary report said: "Constable Gollan has then entered the window, resulting in a verbal and then physical altercation between him and Michael Gregory, which then resulted in the use of OC spray."
Gregory was arrested on suspicion of aggravated assault, aggravated burglary, burglary, resisting arrest, obstruction of justice and assaulting a police officer. Nine weeks later the charges against the then 21-year-old were withdrawn and another man was charged - but only after his father Stan hired a private detective to investigate.
The disciplinary report concluded:
* The arrest of Michael Gregory was unlawful.
* Any physical evidence obtained at the scene was inadmissible in court.
* The use of OC spray was unnecessary.
* The detention of Gregory was unlawful.
The report criticised officers for a lack of leadership, and for not investigating the burglary professionally.
But the police defence now tells a different story about the pepper spraying. Defence statements say that Gregory resisted arrest at the window, so Gollan pepper-sprayed him and then climbed through the window, wrestled Gregory to the ground and handcuffed him. Crown Law opposed the PCA report being used as evidence in the civil case, and declined to comment when contacted by the Herald on Sunday.
"As a father, it has been like having a living cancer inside watching Michael not being able to fully understand why the legal system in our country has been so determined to look after its own," Stan said.
And despite the case dealing with abuse of police power, Gregory has been denied a trial by jury, as Associate Judge Doogue ruled that only a judge could handle the points of law being argued. But Auckland University law professor Dr Bill Hodge said a jury has an important, even constitutional, role in testing the rights of citizens against the powers of police. "In my opinion, the pleadings are not even borderline difficult."
Lawyer Colin Henry is taking the case to the Court of Appeal citing a recent British judgment that the inquest into the death of Princess Diana be decided by a jury.
