Mr Stevens said the psychological assessment report confirmed that with counselling, it was unlikely Roman's offending would ever be repeated.
Roman had also participated in a restorative justice conference with his victims, at which the complainants' expressed no objection to his client serving an electronically monitored sentence at his original address.
Mr Stevens said as part of his offer to make amends, Roman had paid half the cost of installing a security light at his neighbour's home after peering into her house and stealing her underwear. Roman was also immediately able to pay $320 for a stolen camera, which he threw away after he burgled the second victim's home on March 2.
Judge Ingram told Roman his offending was serious enough to warrant a prison sentence.
However, the judge said Roman had taken a "very responsible approach" in fronting up to his victims and ensuring there were sufficient safeguards in place to help him avoid offending in this way again.
Judge Ingram said after considering a psychological assessment and restorative justice conference report, he was persuaded that community detention, supervision and community work were the appropriate sanctions.