But the recreational sector fears bag-limit cuts may be favoured because of findings that the recreational take is well above its 2600-tonne allowance.
It is understood another option is to maintain the status quo to allow for further research, although scientists are standing by their assessment of the fishery and the need for action.
After briefings earlier this month, the Sport Fishing Council wrote to the ministry urging the management review be deferred for a year so better information could be gathered.
Fishing companies have also lobbied the ministry, offering voluntary measures ranging from on-board video monitoring and improved record keeping to tagging and releasing fish for data gathering.
Meanwhile, separate polls have found recreational fishers favour an increase in the minimum legal size over bag-limit cuts, if their allowance is to be restricted. But the overwhelming preference of respondents to polls by www.nzherald.co.nz and online retailer marine-deals.co.nz is to reduce commercial catches.
nzherald.co.nz poll
What changes should be made to the Snapper 1 fishery? (8500 votes).
• 55 per cent decrease commercial catch limits.
• 18 per cent increase the legal minimum size of fish taken.
• 15 per cent Regulate a maximum legal size of fish taken (to maintain breeding stock).
• 8 per cent Decrease recreational catch (bag) limits.
• 4 per cent Keep the status quo.
marine-deals.co.nz poll
(300 votes)
• 57 per cent commercial fishing is the problem.
• 35 per cent increase legal size.
• 6 per cent bring in a maximum size to help keep breeders.
• 1.5 per cent lower quotas for recreational fishers.
• 0.4 per cent no change needed.