Cartoonists are allowed a lot of leeway, a lot more than journalists. Exaggeration and metaphor is permitted. If they upset a reader, that could be a testimony to their success, suggests the Press Council.
But both printed journalism and cartoons must abide by the same threshold - accuracy.
For these cartoons to succeed and take the higher moral ground, the reader has to be confronted with the truth.
Earlier in my career I had the Porirua beat. Poverty on the Porirua East side is a real thing. Breakfasts in Schools was commonplace, and I went to a lot of them as a reporter.
These cartoons are saying people are cheating the Breakfast in Schools system. I have never had a sense of such a thing in the stories I've covered. What I have found, a lot of the time, is embarrassment that sometimes there isn't food in the house.
Perhaps it is true that adults will buy smokes, but will run out of food before payday. It probably happens a lot.
But I believe these cartoons fall short of a threshold of accuracy, in saying the "poor" are ripping off the system to their advantage. That is not truth. That is propaganda.