Pointon's lawyer Michael Bott said Judge Heath's decision is a matter of common sense and largely reflects New Zealand's attitudes. "It's a perfectly sensible decision.
"What it points to is the growing tolerance in New Zealand of diverse lifestyles and freedom of expression," he said.
"The judge pointed out that Mr Pointon was going out of his way to be away from most people and was being sensitive to their needs. There was no element of exhibitionism. He was 20km away from a built-up area."
Bott said he did not believe the case would lead to widespread nudity.
"All it does is encourage people to understand what is simply people expressing themselves and be tolerant of that.
"It promotes mirth, rather than condemnation."
Bott - a lawyer who specialises in civil liberties cases - added he would not be taking up the pastime.
"The last thing you'd want is a melanoma on your bits."
- Herald on Sunday