Going into this year's election, Labour is determined not to again be caught with its pants down as it has been in its last two outings.
It has dropped plans to raise the pension age and has shelved a capital gains tax which is widely seen as the most effective way to deal with the property speculators it seems determined to target.
With the relatively recent, so-called bright line test, those who buy and sell property within two years face a capital gains tax, anyway, so speculators are already facing the consequences of putting the blowtorch on the housing market.
That's not to mention the higher deposits they now must come up with.
To muddy the waters, Labour's Andrew Little's talking about cracking down on negative gearing which few people have a handle on anyway and probably even fewer understand.
Essentially it's where your payments on the mortgage and the upkeep of your property are more expensive than the money you receive in rent. You're basically borrowing to make a loss which has tax advantages and Labour reckons it shouldn't.
When you sell the property you also get the capital gain, providing you make the sale more than two years after you bought it.
But by making dramatic changes to negative gearing Labour could affect the very people it claims to represent: the renters who'll inevitably end up paying more as owners move to turn the negative into a positive.