In their decision, a bench of three Court of Appeal judges stated: “It should have been very clear to the NZDF, following the Yardley decision, that any materially less-flexible response to a failure to be vaccinated would require clear justification.”
The judgment stated that the evidence provided by the NZDF “fell well short of providing justifications for the relevant measures that are sufficient to meet the s 5 NZBORA [New Zealand Bill of Rights] burden.”
Following the decision, lawyer Matthew Hague, who represented the appellants in the Court of Appeal, said: “It is a fantastic result for the protection of fundamental rights in New Zealand.
“Members of our Armed Forces sacrifice much in the service of our country, which means upholding their fundamental rights all the more important.
“I call on the Chief of Defence to reinstate everyone who lost their jobs because of the unlawful mandate.”