That was $145.7 million more than the forecast $170 million cost of keeping it at 14 weeks.
Ms Moroney said: "The Government should keep an open mind about the financial veto. They haven't got all the financial information they need to make that decision."
The Department of Labour figures did not take into account the tax paid on parental leave payments and savings to the Government by not having to pay as much in early childhood subsidies.
But Mr English was adamant yesterday that the Government would use its financial veto because that level of extra spending was unaffordable.
"We don't have the cash to extend paid parental leave dramatically."
He also rejected suggestions of a lesser increase to the leave provisions.
The Government cannot use its veto until the final reading of a bill - after it has been considered by a select committee and the public have made submissions.
United Future leader Peter Dunne will support the bill and said he believed Mr English's decision to veto it was premature.
The Department of Labour advice to the Government also said that New Zealand was ranked 24th out of 25 countries in the OECD for its paid parental leave scheme - ahead of only the United States, which had no paid parental leave.
Australia moved to 18 weeks last year.
THE FIGURES
Costs to increase paid parental leave:
2012/13
Existing scheme (14 weeks): $160.2 million
18 weeks: $205.9 million
Extra cost: $45.7 million
2013/14
Existing scheme (14 weeks): $165 million
22 weeks: $259.2 million
Extra cost: $94.2 million
2014/15
Existing scheme (14 weeks): $169.9 million
26 weeks: $315.6 million
Extra cost: $145.7 million
Source: Department of Labour advice to Government in April.