The concept that they are major players representing many times more New Zealanders than Peters does has clearly escaped them.
You will know I have been fearful of this all along. This is exactly what happened 20 years ago.
My hopes were raised when the October 12 deadline was offered - that indicated that perhaps lessons had been learned. No such luck.
The Peters-New Zealand First experience of 1996 is no different to the 2017 version - nothing has changed.
Two decades of MMP and we have got exactly nowhere. The question is: do we do anything about it?
Is this enough of a lesson to realise that MMP in its worst form doesn't work?
Or when a deal is finally struck we all move on as though nothing happened, and most of the current disgruntlement is born of boredom.
In a modern, highly connected world we expect stuff to happen fast.
In my experience, a deal feels right or it doesn't - and the longer it takes the less likely it is to hold.
This reeks of a mix of too much minutiae - and too much Peters vanity - too much of a power play.
It feels like a shambles waiting to be explained, and then it either unravels or implodes.