The researchers say "incremental measures" such as mandatory plain packaging of tobacco, which was approved by Parliament yesterday, smokefree cars and mass-media campaigns, "remain worthwhile".
New and "more substantive" policies should be explored, such as the "tobacco-free generation" idea, in which the legal age for tobacco sales would increase every year (from 18 at present), or reducing the number of tobacco vendors (from around 6000 currently).
The researchers note uncertainties around the relationship between increasing tobacco prices and declining demand. They say Increased access to electronic cigarettes might lead to larger smoking reductions than predicted.
Returning to an idea previously ruled out by the Government, they call for some of its tobacco tax take to be devoted to expanding quit-smoking support schemes and media campaigns targeting low-income smokers "who may be disproportionately affected by tax rises if they continue to smoke".
"Earmarking tobacco tax for tobacco control is already common practice in various jurisdictions overseas - eg, Iceland, California, Switzerland, Vietnam.
"Indeed, it seems unethical for the New Zealand Government to not provide smokers with more motivation to quit and more direct support to quit when it is dealing with a highly addictive substance."
The Herald has sought a response from the Associate Minister of Health Sam Lotu-Iiga.
The Government spends about $60 million a year on quit-smoking programmes and reaps in $1.5 billion a year in tobacco taxes. It is estimated that smokers cost about $1.9b more in health care than non-smokers.