In summing up the case, defence lawyer Marcus Zintl said there had been "serious inconsistencies" in the evidence of the two complainants, especially concerning the machete. Both complainants had been neither "credible nor reliable".
Mr Zintl said one of them had only mentioned pushing the machete away, not grappling with it or handling it, and those were "very important details" for one of the complainants to leave out when he was talking to the police.
Mr Zintl said he was not suggesting that Harmon's actions should be condoned but they were not criminal in any way.
"At most, there was finger pointing and strong words, no threats were made."