Thursday, 18 August 2022
Meet the JournalistsPremiumAucklandWellingtonCanterbury/South Island
CrimePoliticsHealthEducationEnvironment and ClimateNZ Herald FocusData journalismKāhu, Māori ContentPropertyWeather
Small BusinessOpinionPersonal FinanceEconomyBusiness TravelCapital Markets
Politics
Premium SportRugbyCommonwealth GamesCricketRacingNetballBoxingLeagueFootballSuper RugbyAthleticsBasketballMotorsportTennisCyclingGolfAmerican SportsHockeyUFC
NZH Local FocusThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay of Plenty TimesHawke's Bay TodayRotorua Daily PostWhanganui ChronicleStratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu Courier
Covid-19
Te Rito
Te Rito
OneRoof PropertyCommercial Property
Open JusticeVideoPodcastsTechnologyWorldOpinion
SpyTVMoviesBooksMusicCultureSideswipeCompetitions
Fashion & BeautyFood & DrinkRoyalsRelationshipsWellbeingPets & AnimalsVivaCanvasEat WellCompetitionsRestaurants & Menus
New Zealand TravelAustralia TravelInternational Travel
Our Green FutureRuralOneRoof Property
Career AdviceCorporate News
Driven MotoringPhotos
SudokuCodecrackerCrosswordsWordsearchDaily quizzes
Classifieds
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDriven MotoringThe CountryPhoto SalesNZ Herald InsightsWatchMeGrabOneiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
New Zealand

Legality of parking fines questioned by lawyers after woman's $65 fee for being 11 minutes late

28 Jan, 2015 07:25 PM4 minutes to read
Emmeline Kendrick was just 11 minutes late returning to her car at a Wilson Park. Photo / Dean Purcell

Emmeline Kendrick was just 11 minutes late returning to her car at a Wilson Park. Photo / Dean Purcell

Otago Daily Times
By David Loughrey

Lawyers say motorists hit by a $65 fine or ''breach notice'' charged by a private car park provider at its pay and display machines have been handed a penalty that is not legal.

Their opinion came after yesterday's Otago Daily Times report on a Dunedin woman's angry reaction to a ticket for that amount for being just 11 minutes over time at a Wilson Parking site at Forsyth Barr Stadium.

The story garnered reaction from Invercargill to Auckland from people clearly angry with the company's actions.

A Dunedin city councillor has called for discussion on whether parking services on council land should be run by the council instead of private companies.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Wilson Parking said last night its actions were ''completely compliant''.

Emmeline Kendrick was just 11 minutes late returning to her car at the Wilson Parking site, so the fine added up to $5.90 a minute.

She described the amount as ''unbelievable'' and ''extraordinary''.

Dunedin Community Law Centre managing solicitor Caryl O'Connor described it as ''punitive'' and ''unlawful''.

Wilson Parking was ''very familiar with this issue'', as it had been canvassed through legal avenues in the past. Ms O'Connor said fines could only be imposed by a statutory authority, like a city or regional authority.

''A private company cannot levy a fine.''

Related articles

New Zealand

Peter Calder: Drivers have right to fume at car parking hikes

01 Jul 05:00 PM
New Zealand

Parking worm for early birds

17 Nov 04:00 PM
New Zealand

Tram plan: From isthmus to waterfront

23 Jan 04:00 PM
New Zealand

Pollution doubles near motorways

25 Jan 04:00 PM

The fee was ''so punitive it is effectively a penalty fee and, as such, is unlawful''.

There was clear case law Wilson Parking's attempt to claim a penalty fee to which it was not entitled was unlawful.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

''It is a basic legal principle that an injured party in a contract may only seek what they have lost; they may not make a profit from the situation.''

Another Dunedin solicitor, who asked not to be named, said he had ''several run ins with this company on behalf of clients''.

He had told those clients they were required to pay only ''damages in contract'', the money the company would have received if someone else had occupied the parking space for the relevant period.

''Generally, that's under $5.''

Invercargill solicitor Ben Nettleton said people unhappy with the breach notice could go to the Disputes Tribunal, although there could be a fee.

Mr Nettleton said a cheaper option was to pay their estimate of the damages, put it very clearly in writing they were making that payment in full and final settlement, and if the company accepted the money and did not communicate they did not accept it, ''then they are bound by it''.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Mr Nettleton also said that would usually be less than $5.

Dunedin city councillor Aaron Hawkins responded to the story on his Facebook site yesterday. Last night he said he did not buy into ''the mantra of public bad, private good''.

''We should always be looking at whether privatising core services is our best option.''

The stadium had a private company operating a car park at a publicly owned facility.

''I think in this instance we have a right to be concerned about how the actions and attitudes of that contractor is impacting on the community.''

Cr Hawkins said any money made on the site should go back to the city, not a private company.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

''I would always be interested in having a conversation around any core service that is currently outsourced or privatised, about whether or not it is better placed in house than it is under that arrangement.''

Wilson Parking was sent the legal opinion, and asked for a response. Through a spokeswoman, the company said it used Parking Enforcement Services, a division of Wilson Parking, to help monitor and enforce more than 350 car parks around the country.

The spokeswoman said when a consumer breached the agreed terms of parking, they could be issued with a breach notice.

''The company does not issue 'fines'.

''The breach notice fee is an agreed term of the parking contract.''

Asked if the company used collection agencies or the courts to collect on its notices, she said: ''Wilson Parking does use a collection agency and in some cases we use the small claims process.''

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Premium
Politics

Shane Te Pou: Not every workplace dispute amounts to bullying

17 Aug 05:00 PM
New ZealandUpdated

Rod Emmerson's cartoons: Week of August 15 - 21

17 Aug 06:36 AM
New Zealand

Polyamorous couple had sex in lounge with children in bed

17 Aug 05:00 PM
Premium
New Zealand

Editorial: Labour red-faced over Gaurav Sharma

17 Aug 05:00 PM
Premium
New Zealand

Claire Dale: Can Auckland become an age-friendly city?

17 Aug 05:00 PM

Most Popular

Premium
Shane Te Pou: Not every workplace dispute amounts to bullying
Politics

Shane Te Pou: Not every workplace dispute amounts to bullying

17 Aug 05:00 PM
Premium
Sideswipe: Everyone wants to be the Bing
Entertainment

Sideswipe: Everyone wants to be the Bing

17 Aug 05:00 PM
OCR hike: First-home buyers being hit by double whammy
Business

OCR hike: First-home buyers being hit by double whammy

17 Aug 05:00 PM

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2022 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP