She didn't mince her words, and quite likely realised she had to be blunt to be heard. To make an impact. Telling it like it is, is not infringing someone's human rights.
The students who staged the mass walkout yesterday were the usual suspects - most likely the ones wagging in the first place.
Students like this don't value school. Tellingly, many of them were junior students, in Year 9, who as some seniors pointed out, misinterpreted her message. Or just plain didn't want to hear it.
These students are not crusaders for a better world, they are just trouble makers wanting attention. By all means protest something worth protesting, but storming out of school wearing t-shirts with "F*** you Mrs Crawford" written on them in ballpoint, is about all you need to know about these students and this protest.
They're not interested in dialogue or engagement, they're interested in drama.
They're certainly not interested in school.
You can, at a stretch, forgive the students for being naive, young, or being led by the pack, but as for the parents - the two of them who joined the protest - what were you thinking?
One of the parents said she thought it was good the students were standing up to the Principal. Why? So they learn to disrespect authority at a young age? So they can have yet more time off school? So they can work on their graffiti skills on T-shirts?
Get a grip.
Encourage protest around issues and things you believe in sure, but to stand up and support a bunch of kids playing truant (again) and abusing the Principal as they go is ridiculous.