Break the law as an average citizen and you are in big trouble. Break the law and you happen to be the Government Communications Security Bureau and you are handsomely rewarded with even more unchecked powers open to potential abuse.
Such is the perverse, almost Kafka-esque outcome of the saga surrounding the GCSB's illegal surveillance of Kim Dotcom. The Prime Minister has now flagged special legislation which will legalise the long-standing practice of the bureau providing assistance to sister agencies, such as the Security Intelligence Service and the police, despite the law being absolutely explicit that the GCSB does not spy on New Zealand citizens or permanent residents.
John Key's solution may have a compelling logic for some people. After all, why not pool the resources of the intelligence agencies to catch international criminals or terrorists - especially as Key is promising a radical boost in the level of independent oversight of the GCSB?
Key's dilemma - as shown by the Dotcom case - is that the SIS needs the GCSB's electronic data surveillance function to monitor overseas emails and alert its American and European counterparts to do the same.
Key's solution, however, is rushed No8 fencing wire sort of stuff. For once, the Opposition parties are absolutely right. There should be a full inquiry into the intelligence agencies. Public hearings on any Government-authorised amending legislation - as promised by the Prime Minister - are not sufficient to quell concern. A full inquiry is needed because formally allowing the GCSB some room to function in a domestic context is potentially a huge foot in the door in that arena whatever conditions or provisos are put on such change.
