He appealed to the Immigration and Protection Tribunal, which also ruled against his application.
The Court of Appeal also dismissed his bid.
While independent evidence had confirmed the protest at the bazaar had taken place, it had been in 2010, and not in 2009 as BV had claimed.
"The decision makers did not believe his claim to involvement in the strike or to being pursued as a consequence," Justice Simon France said in his decision.
"Likewise his claimed conversion to Christianity almost 30 years earlier was rejected. Current attendances whilst in New Zealand at Christian services were assessed as being new conduct designed to boost his claim."
The ruling said BV's evidence contained "significant inconsistencies within each version and across versions".
The tribunal had looked at his evidence using the correct 2010 date of the protest and found "in some instances it created implausibility; on a few occasions impossibility in terms of the timeframes".
"The simple reality is that BV's account was, again, not believed," Justice France said.
The man had not demonstrated how he practised his faith since his "alleged conversion" to Christianity, at age 18 after watching a television programme, he said.
Justice France ruled that the decision to refuse him asylum was justified, and dismissed the appeal.