NZ Herald
  • Home
  • Latest news
  • Herald NOW
  • Video
  • New Zealand
  • Sport
  • World
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Podcasts
  • Quizzes
  • Opinion
  • Lifestyle
  • Travel
  • Viva
  • Weather

Subscriptions

  • Herald Premium
  • Viva Premium
  • The Listener
  • BusinessDesk

Sections

  • Latest news
  • New Zealand
    • All New Zealand
    • Crime
    • Politics
    • Education
    • Open Justice
    • Scam Update
  • Herald NOW
  • On The Up
  • World
    • All World
    • Australia
    • Asia
    • UK
    • United States
    • Middle East
    • Europe
    • Pacific
  • Business
    • All Business
    • MarketsSharesCurrencyCommoditiesStock TakesCrypto
    • Markets with Madison
    • Media Insider
    • Business analysis
    • Personal financeKiwiSaverInterest ratesTaxInvestment
    • EconomyInflationGDPOfficial cash rateEmployment
    • Small business
    • Business reportsMood of the BoardroomProject AucklandSustainable business and financeCapital markets reportAgribusiness reportInfrastructure reportDynamic business
    • Deloitte Top 200 Awards
    • CompaniesAged CareAgribusinessAirlinesBanking and financeConstructionEnergyFreight and logisticsHealthcareManufacturingMedia and MarketingRetailTelecommunicationsTourism
  • Opinion
    • All Opinion
    • Analysis
    • Editorials
    • Business analysis
    • Premium opinion
    • Letters to the editor
  • Politics
  • Sport
    • All Sport
    • OlympicsParalympics
    • RugbySuper RugbyNPCAll BlacksBlack FernsRugby sevensSchool rugby
    • CricketBlack CapsWhite Ferns
    • Racing
    • NetballSilver Ferns
    • LeagueWarriorsNRL
    • FootballWellington PhoenixAuckland FCAll WhitesFootball FernsEnglish Premier League
    • GolfNZ Open
    • MotorsportFormula 1
    • Boxing
    • UFC
    • BasketballNBABreakersTall BlacksTall Ferns
    • Tennis
    • Cycling
    • Athletics
    • SailingAmerica's CupSailGP
    • Rowing
  • Lifestyle
    • All Lifestyle
    • Viva - Food, fashion & beauty
    • Society Insider
    • Royals
    • Sex & relationships
    • Food & drinkRecipesRecipe collectionsRestaurant reviewsRestaurant bookings
    • Health & wellbeing
    • Fashion & beauty
    • Pets & animals
    • The Selection - Shop the trendsShop fashionShop beautyShop entertainmentShop giftsShop home & living
    • Milford's Investing Place
  • Entertainment
    • All Entertainment
    • TV
    • MoviesMovie reviews
    • MusicMusic reviews
    • BooksBook reviews
    • Culture
    • ReviewsBook reviewsMovie reviewsMusic reviewsRestaurant reviews
  • Travel
    • All Travel
    • News
    • New ZealandNorthlandAucklandWellingtonCanterburyOtago / QueenstownNelson-TasmanBest NZ beaches
    • International travelAustraliaPacific IslandsEuropeUKUSAAfricaAsia
    • Rail holidays
    • Cruise holidays
    • Ski holidays
    • Luxury travel
    • Adventure travel
  • Kāhu Māori news
  • Environment
    • All Environment
    • Our Green Future
  • Talanoa Pacific news
  • Property
    • All Property
    • Property Insider
    • Interest rates tracker
    • Residential property listings
    • Commercial property listings
  • Health
  • Technology
    • All Technology
    • AI
    • Social media
  • Rural
    • All Rural
    • Dairy farming
    • Sheep & beef farming
    • Horticulture
    • Animal health
    • Rural business
    • Rural life
    • Rural technology
    • Opinion
    • Audio & podcasts
  • Weather forecasts
    • All Weather forecasts
    • Kaitaia
    • Whangārei
    • Dargaville
    • Auckland
    • Thames
    • Tauranga
    • Hamilton
    • Whakatāne
    • Rotorua
    • Tokoroa
    • Te Kuiti
    • Taumaranui
    • Taupō
    • Gisborne
    • New Plymouth
    • Napier
    • Hastings
    • Dannevirke
    • Whanganui
    • Palmerston North
    • Levin
    • Paraparaumu
    • Masterton
    • Wellington
    • Motueka
    • Nelson
    • Blenheim
    • Westport
    • Reefton
    • Kaikōura
    • Greymouth
    • Hokitika
    • Christchurch
    • Ashburton
    • Timaru
    • Wānaka
    • Oamaru
    • Queenstown
    • Dunedin
    • Gore
    • Invercargill
  • Meet the journalists
  • Promotions & competitions
  • OneRoof property listings
  • Driven car news

Puzzles & Quizzes

  • Puzzles
    • All Puzzles
    • Sudoku
    • Code Cracker
    • Crosswords
    • Cryptic crossword
    • Wordsearch
  • Quizzes
    • All Quizzes
    • Morning quiz
    • Afternoon quiz
    • Sports quiz

Regions

  • Northland
    • All Northland
    • Far North
    • Kaitaia
    • Kerikeri
    • Kaikohe
    • Bay of Islands
    • Whangarei
    • Dargaville
    • Kaipara
    • Mangawhai
  • Auckland
  • Waikato
    • All Waikato
    • Hamilton
    • Coromandel & Hauraki
    • Matamata & Piako
    • Cambridge
    • Te Awamutu
    • Tokoroa & South Waikato
    • Taupō & Tūrangi
  • Bay of Plenty
    • All Bay of Plenty
    • Katikati
    • Tauranga
    • Mount Maunganui
    • Pāpāmoa
    • Te Puke
    • Whakatāne
  • Rotorua
  • Hawke's Bay
    • All Hawke's Bay
    • Napier
    • Hastings
    • Havelock North
    • Central Hawke's Bay
    • Wairoa
  • Taranaki
    • All Taranaki
    • Stratford
    • New Plymouth
    • Hāwera
  • Manawatū - Whanganui
    • All Manawatū - Whanganui
    • Whanganui
    • Palmerston North
    • Manawatū
    • Tararua
    • Horowhenua
  • Wellington
    • All Wellington
    • Kapiti
    • Wairarapa
    • Upper Hutt
    • Lower Hutt
  • Nelson & Tasman
    • All Nelson & Tasman
    • Motueka
    • Nelson
    • Tasman
  • Marlborough
  • West Coast
  • Canterbury
    • All Canterbury
    • Kaikōura
    • Christchurch
    • Ashburton
    • Timaru
  • Otago
    • All Otago
    • Oamaru
    • Dunedin
    • Balclutha
    • Alexandra
    • Queenstown
    • Wanaka
  • Southland
    • All Southland
    • Invercargill
    • Gore
    • Stewart Island
  • Gisborne

Media

  • Video
    • All Video
    • NZ news video
    • Herald NOW
    • Business news video
    • Politics news video
    • Sport video
    • World news video
    • Lifestyle video
    • Entertainment video
    • Travel video
    • Markets with Madison
    • Kea Kids news
  • Podcasts
    • All Podcasts
    • The Front Page
    • On the Tiles
    • Ask me Anything
    • The Little Things
  • Cartoons
  • Photo galleries
  • Today's Paper - E-editions
  • Photo sales
  • Classifieds

NZME Network

  • Advertise with NZME
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • BusinessDesk
  • Newstalk ZB
  • Sunlive
  • ZM
  • The Hits
  • Coast
  • Radio Hauraki
  • The Alternative Commentary Collective
  • Gold
  • Flava
  • iHeart Radio
  • Hokonui
  • Radio Wanaka
  • iHeartCountry New Zealand
  • Restaurant Hub
  • NZME Events

SubscribeSign In
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand

<i>Kevin Clarke:</i> Ramshackle contest in need of redesign

NZ Herald
26 Oct, 2009 03:00 PM5 mins to read

Subscribe to listen

Access to Herald Premium articles require a Premium subscription. Subscribe now to listen.
Already a subscriber?  Sign in here

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech.
‌
Save

    Share this article

With the dropping of the requirement for 'iconic', 'legacy' development from the design brief, Auckland has been deprived of huge future revenue. Photo / Supplied

With the dropping of the requirement for 'iconic', 'legacy' development from the design brief, Auckland has been deprived of huge future revenue. Photo / Supplied

Opinion

Conventional wisdom has it that to win a major architectural competition, you have to throw a double six first time. Anything less won't do. The competitors are simply too good.

Not so for the Queens Wharf competition, however. By far the most assured path to winning the Queens Wharf competition
was to not enter it in the first place. Sounds strange but it's true.

The Stage 2 designs for the competition were due to be submitted last Friday. Three of the eight submissions will have come from three teams who did not need to take part in the competition at Stage 1.

It is almost certain that one of those three teams will win the competition, with a design that has not been seen previously. It is almost certain that none of the Stage 1 finalists has any realistic prospect of success.

Here's how this curious outcome was engineered by the competition's organisers.

The Queens Wharf competition conditions effectively required the five selected design "finalists" from Stage 1 to then team-up with one of three selected "consultant/delivery teams" for the development of their designs during Stage 2 of the competition process.

If the so-called "Stage 1 finalists" team up with one of the three selected "consultant/delivery teams", they are required to waive their copyright, will have no design or any other real authority and will be set in competition against the "consultant/delivery team" they join.

The three selected "consultant/delivery teams" were selected on the basis of their delivery credentials, rather than their designs. However, the three selected "consultant/delivery teams" are entitled to produce designs of their own, during Stage 2, without firstly having to compete in the design competition.

What sort of "design competition" is that ? For the three selected "teams", it's a bit like being entitled to sit an exam after the answers have been published.

To produce winnable schemes, the three selected "teams" would need to eliminate the serious and almost universally fatal flaws embodied within the so-called "finalists"' schemes.

There is virtually no chance that they would bother doing that, since the three selected "teams" would inevitably wish to focus their resources on their own schemes, rather than spend time and money on almost certain losers - for which they would gain no revenue at Stage 2, and no design recognition either.

The three "consultant/delivery teams" are not in competition with the competition's approximately 240 competitors. They are not even in competition with the five so-called "Stage 1 finalists", since four of the five finalists' proposals have no realistic chance of satisfying the competition's brief.

Rather, they are in competition with the two other selected "teams". As such, Stage 1 of the competition has been rendered worthless by the competition's conditions.

The poor management of the competition did not stop there. The brief was unwieldy, self contradictory and entirely inadequate. It failed to even vaguely outline the functional requirements for an international cruise ship terminal. Not such a flash outcome for a competition that included the requirement for such a terminal.

The Stage 2 submissions will be judged over the next few weeks. The chairman of the "design advisory panel" recently acknowledged that in selecting the Stage 1 "finalists", that panel did not recognise the competition's briefing requirement for an "iconic' or "legacy" design.

The lacklustre outcome of that decision was missed by virtually no one.

Superb iconic developments generate huge revenues for the cities in which they are built. As an example, the Guggenheim Museum at Bilbao transformed that town, and generates $200 million dollars in tourism revenue annually - two or three times the cost of the Queens Wharf development.

By the simple act of dropping the competition's briefed requirement for "iconic", "legacy" developments from further and serious consideration at the Queens Wharf development, Auckland was deprived of huge future revenue.

However, much worse, it was condemned to accepting less than the world class proposals that could easily be afforded.

That decision also dismayed the great number of New Zealand citizens who are alive to the enormous urban benefits that only superbly iconic developments deliver.

Slamming out an inadequately briefed and hastily evaluated development solely for the purpose of staging the Rugby World Cup is pointless when the city already has a comprehensively developed platform and infrastructure for staging the event, at the Viaduct Basin.

Everyone knows that the Viaduct site comfortably accommodates huge crowds, that its northern plaza can be quickly fitted out to provide world-class televised pizzazz required for the World Cup and shelter for its large crowds.

The rest of the required catering and infrastructural requirements are already there, and would benefit greatly from the World Cup festivities - in a glittering setting.

The city and country owes it to itself to have a superb international cruise ship terminal, a superb urban extension on to the Queens Wharf, and a superb location that Auckland's citizens and its visitors can delight in at a harbour-edge site that is uniquely Auckland, uniquely attractive, directly accessible to its CBD and readily able to be done.

None of these outcomes is likely, unless the current Queens Wharf agenda is dropped now and restaged properly. However, all those worthwhile outcomes are easily possible, if responsible management and sound urban planning are allowed to supplant knee-jerk, half-baked political gameplay.

* Kevin Clarke is an architect who entered Stage 1 of the competition. Written on behalf of the NZ Institute of Architects North Shore practice group.

Discover more

Opinion

What do you think should be done with Queens Wharf?

29 Sep 08:16 PM
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.
Save

    Share this article

Latest from New Zealand

Opinion

NZ Herald comments: The stories open for discussion today

07 Jul 10:05 PM
New Zealand

Four injured in bus crash on Southland highway after reports of black ice

07 Jul 09:52 PM
Premium
New Zealand

$61m building project under way at one of nation's richest private schools

07 Jul 09:00 PM

From early mornings to easy living

sponsored
Advertisement
Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

NZ Herald comments: The stories open for discussion today

NZ Herald comments: The stories open for discussion today

07 Jul 10:05 PM

Want to have your say on our stories? Here's how.

Four injured in bus crash on Southland highway after reports of black ice

Four injured in bus crash on Southland highway after reports of black ice

07 Jul 09:52 PM
Premium
$61m building project under way at one of nation's richest private schools

$61m building project under way at one of nation's richest private schools

07 Jul 09:00 PM
Travel Tuesday with Lorna Riley

Travel Tuesday with Lorna Riley

Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky
sponsored

Solar bat monitors uncover secrets of Auckland’s night sky

NZ Herald
  • About NZ Herald
  • Meet the journalists
  • Newsletters
  • Classifieds
  • Help & support
  • Contact us
  • House rules
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of use
  • Competition terms & conditions
  • Our use of AI
Subscriber Services
  • NZ Herald e-editions
  • Daily puzzles & quizzes
  • Manage your digital subscription
  • Manage your print subscription
  • Subscribe to the NZ Herald newspaper
  • Subscribe to Herald Premium
  • Gift a subscription
  • Subscriber FAQs
  • Subscription terms & conditions
  • Promotions and subscriber benefits
NZME Network
  • The New Zealand Herald
  • The Northland Age
  • The Northern Advocate
  • Waikato Herald
  • Bay of Plenty Times
  • Rotorua Daily Post
  • Hawke's Bay Today
  • Whanganui Chronicle
  • Viva
  • NZ Listener
  • Newstalk ZB
  • BusinessDesk
  • OneRoof
  • Driven Car Guide
  • iHeart Radio
  • Restaurant Hub
NZME
  • About NZME
  • NZME careers
  • Advertise with NZME
  • Digital self-service advertising
  • Book your classified ad
  • Photo sales
  • NZME Events
  • © Copyright 2025 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP