Thursday, 30 November 2023
KaitaiaWhangareiDargavilleAucklandThamesTaurangaHamiltonWhakataneRotoruaTokoroaTe KuitiTaumarunuiTaupoGisborneNew PlymouthNapierHastingsDannevirkeWhanganuiPalmerston NorthLevinParaparaumuMastertonWellingtonMotuekaNelsonBlenheimWestportReeftonKaikouraGreymouthHokitikaChristchurchAshburtonTimaruWanakaOamaruQueenstownDunedinGoreInvercargill
NZ HeraldThe Northern AdvocateThe Northland AgeThe AucklanderWaikato HeraldBay Of Plenty TimesRotorua Daily PostHawke's Bay TodayWhanganui ChronicleThe Stratford PressManawatu GuardianKapiti NewsHorowhenua ChronicleTe Awamutu CourierVivaEat WellOneRoofDRIVEN Car GuideThe CountryPhoto SalesiHeart RadioRestaurant Hub
Voyager 2023 media awards
Subscribe

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.
Home / New Zealand / Politics

<i>John Armstrong:</i> 2025 report too extreme to promote

NZ Herald
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail
John Key. Photo / Dean Purcell

John Key. Photo / Dean Purcell

Perhaps the most disappointing aspect of yesterday's report from the Don Brash-chaired 2025 Taskforce is that the panel has delivered exactly the kind of extreme right-wing-policy prescription its critics had predicted it would.

So extreme is the market-driven mix recommended by the taskforce that even Act MPs who instigated its establishment may blanch at some of its findings - Sir Roger Douglas excepted, of course. For the former finance minister, the report amounts to the "unfinished business" still to be completed when the public's appetite for such "big bang" reform wilted in the early 1990s.

The political market for market-oriented solutions is now tiny. That, however, seems to be of no consequence to the taskforce, which insists there is no alternative to following its set of recommendations holus-bolus if the Government's "aspiration" of bridging the gap between the incomes of New Zealanders and those of their Australian cousins is to be met by the target date of 2025.

But with only a small audience finding the suggestions palatable, Brash's hope the report will spark a "national conversation" will be in vain. Instead, the report's blinkered thinking has simply made it that much easier for politicians to dismiss it out of hand.

It is a missed opportunity. Sure, the panel's brief was to come up with solutions it thought best and leave it to the politicians to worry about implementing them. But a more politically calculated approach would have seen ideas floated more in the realm of the politically possible than just the production of a Business Roundtable wish-list.

That would have made it more difficult for the Prime Minister and the Finance Minister to pooh-pooh the findings of something from which National has always been careful to keep some distance, given it was part of the price of securing Act's support on confidence and money supply after last year's election.

Indeed, John Key and Bill English may have actually been grateful for some practical ideas as to ways and means of getting what they call a "step change" in the New Zealand economy.

But barring the references to a dual tax system which would see tax on company income much lower than personal tax levels, the report shows a poverty of vision when it comes to adopting ideas which have worked elsewhere in boosting investment and entrepreneurship.

It is not as if the taskforce can plead ignorance. The PM has made it patently clear he will have no truck with any Douglas-like "big bang" agenda, especially one requiring National to break a string of election promises.

Key will not be seduced by the taskforce's talk of "successful" political leaders being the ones capable of finding ways of taking the public with them when they make "courageous" reforms. Neither will he be fooled by the report's assertion that the apparent belief that far-reaching economic reform means inevitable electoral suicide has simply not been the experience in New Zealand.

Tell that to Ruth Richardson. She was dumped as finance minister after the National Party leadership held her 1991 Mother of All Budgets as responsible for National's near defeat at the 1993 election. The only difference between Richardson's magnum opus and that produced by the 2025 Taskforce is that the latter would be the longer suicide note for any party thinking of following it.

Related articles

New Zealand

What should be done to close the pay gap between NZ and Australia?

29 Nov 10:38 PM
Business

Aussie catch up no small feat

29 Nov 09:00 PM
New Zealand|Politics

Catching Oz not possible without slashing Govt spending - Brash

30 Nov 04:16 AM
New Zealand|Politics

Axe Taskforce 2025 - Goff

03 Dec 03:34 AM
Saveshare

Share this article

facebookcopy linktwitterlinkedinredditemail

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

New Zealand

Thirteen fire appliances tackling blaze at Auckland refuse station

29 Nov 08:25 AM
New Zealand

Te Pāti Māori co-leader says smokefree reversal ‘systemic genocide’

29 Nov 07:54 AM
New Zealand

Focus: The White Lady faces a bun shortage

New Zealand

Restaurant axe attacker acquitted on grounds of insanity

29 Nov 07:07 AM

Top toys of 2023 for kids & ‘kidults’

sponsored

Advertisement

Advertise with NZME.

Latest from New Zealand

Thirteen fire appliances tackling blaze at Auckland refuse station

Thirteen fire appliances tackling blaze at Auckland refuse station

29 Nov 08:25 AM

Police and 13 fire appliances are attending an incident on the North Shore.

Te Pāti Māori co-leader says smokefree reversal ‘systemic genocide’

Te Pāti Māori co-leader says smokefree reversal ‘systemic genocide’

29 Nov 07:54 AM
Focus: The White Lady faces a bun shortage

Focus: The White Lady faces a bun shortage

Restaurant axe attacker acquitted on grounds of insanity

Restaurant axe attacker acquitted on grounds of insanity

29 Nov 07:07 AM
Toy trends for Christmas
sponsored

Toy trends for Christmas

About NZMEHelp & SupportContact UsSubscribe to NZ HeraldHouse Rules
Manage Your Print SubscriptionNZ Herald E-EditionAdvertise with NZMEBook Your AdPrivacy Policy
Terms of UseCompetition Terms & ConditionsSubscriptions Terms & Conditions
© Copyright 2023 NZME Publishing Limited
TOP