The research found members of the Dunedin study who scored poorly in neurological evaluations and tests of verbal comprehension, language development, motor skills and social behaviour tests at 3 most often ended up taking the lion's share of social services as adults.
"We also found that members of this group tended to have grown up in more socio-economically deprived environments, experienced child maltreatment, scored poorly on childhood IQ tests and exhibited low childhood self-control," Poulton said.
While the "high cost" group made up only 22 per cent of study members, by mid-life they were responsible for 81 per cent of all convictions from the cohort, had received 66 per cent of the cohort's welfare benefits and accounted for 77 per cent of the years in which children of study members were growing up fatherless.
Many social service providers were already aware some people used more services than others, however it was the first time it had been shown "high-need/ high-cost" individuals could be recognised as children, he said.
The findings were enabled by a "unique situation" in which governmental data on benefits, criminal convictions and health services could be analysed alongside the smaller scale but more detailed information gathered by the Dunedin study.
He said the findings highlighted the importance of a social-sector wide approach to addressing childhood disadvantage early so costs for all members of society could be reduced.